<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPBible: Open Source Bible Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missiondisk.com/2010/02/20/bpbible-open-source-bible-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missiondisk.com/2010/02/20/bpbible-open-source-bible-software/</link>
	<description>A software resource for missionaries and pastors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:11:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Dow</title>
		<link>http://www.missiondisk.com/2010/02/20/bpbible-open-source-bible-software/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missiondisk.com/?p=158#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, 

Thanks for stopping by!

My comment wasn&#039;t really aimed at any specific flaw that I&#039;ve found. Jamie and I have both been professional developers and we tend to subscribe to the &quot;when it&#039;s ready for prime time you call it 1.0&quot; way of thinking. I understand that others may look at that differently.

I&#039;ll be happy to flex the software a little bit over the next few days and send you feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, </p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>
<p>My comment wasn&#8217;t really aimed at any specific flaw that I&#8217;ve found. Jamie and I have both been professional developers and we tend to subscribe to the &#8220;when it&#8217;s ready for prime time you call it 1.0&#8243; way of thinking. I understand that others may look at that differently.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be happy to flex the software a little bit over the next few days and send you feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.missiondisk.com/2010/02/20/bpbible-open-source-bible-software/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missiondisk.com/?p=158#comment-428</guid>
		<description>As a user and developer of BPBible, I&#039;m encouraged by your comments.  While I think it&#039;s fair to say that we try to go beyond what CrossWire provides (in areas like gospel harmonies and topic management), a key reason for using it was so that a large number of useful resources could be made available, and the list continues to grow.

With regard to our version number, different people have different expectations of a version number (from those who say they won&#039;t touch or recommend it until it reaches version 1 as it&#039;s obviously not intended for mainstream use to those who say &quot;isn&#039;t it great how much it does when it isn&#039;t even at version 1?&quot;).  I think there are still a number of things that need doing before I am happy with it being called version 1, though I use it daily.  However, I&#039;m curious to know what you think needs doing before it&#039;s ready for a version 1 or some similar milestone.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a user and developer of BPBible, I&#8217;m encouraged by your comments.  While I think it&#8217;s fair to say that we try to go beyond what CrossWire provides (in areas like gospel harmonies and topic management), a key reason for using it was so that a large number of useful resources could be made available, and the list continues to grow.</p>
<p>With regard to our version number, different people have different expectations of a version number (from those who say they won&#8217;t touch or recommend it until it reaches version 1 as it&#8217;s obviously not intended for mainstream use to those who say &#8220;isn&#8217;t it great how much it does when it isn&#8217;t even at version 1?&#8221;).  I think there are still a number of things that need doing before I am happy with it being called version 1, though I use it daily.  However, I&#8217;m curious to know what you think needs doing before it&#8217;s ready for a version 1 or some similar milestone.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
